Command of Evidence: Quantitative

SAT Reading and Writing· difficulty 5/5

Researchers studied four pesticide formulations for effectiveness against a beetle pest. They reported pest mortality (%) at two beetle life stages: larvae and adults. Formulation I, 92% (larvae), 65% (adults); II, 80%, 84%; III, 96%, 50%; IV, 78%, 82%. The team argued that for field application, peak larval performance is misleading; what matters is performance across life stages. The strongest support is ______

Which choice most logically completes the text using the data above?

  • A

    Formulation I's larval mortality of 92%.

  • B

    the average across formulations.

  • C

    Formulation III's larval mortality of 96%.

  • D

    the rank reversal: Formulation III leads on larvae (96%) but trails badly on adults (50%); Formulation IV's lower larval rate (78%) becomes a leader on adults (82%).

    check_circle

Explanation

"Peak larval performance is misleading" requires showing rank reversal between life stages. Choice B captures this directly: III leads on larvae but lags on adults; IV is the opposite.

Want 10 more like this — adaptive to your weak spots?

Related questions

SAT Reading and Writing · Command of Evidence: Quantitative Practice Question | Acemy