Question

Solving an exponential equation by factoring powers

Original question: 11. Solve and check. a) 2x+22x=482^{x+2}-2^x=48

Expert Verified Solution

thumb_up100%(1 rated)

Key takeaway: This exponential equation becomes simple once the common factor 2x2^x is pulled out. After that, the problem reduces to a linear equation in an exponential expression.

Start by factoring the common power

The equation is

2x+22x=48.2^{x+2}-2^x=48.

Rewrite the first term:

2x+2=2x22=42x.2^{x+2}=2^x\cdot 2^2=4\cdot 2^x.

So the equation becomes

42x2x=48.4\cdot 2^x-2^x=48.

Factor out 2x2^x:

2x(41)=48.2^x(4-1)=48.

That gives

32x=48.3\cdot 2^x=48.

Solve for xx

Divide both sides by 33:

2x=16.2^x=16.

Since 16=2416=2^4, we have

x=4.x=4.

Check the solution

Substitute x=4x=4 into the original equation:

24+224=2624=6416=48.2^{4+2}-2^4=2^6-2^4=64-16=48.

The check works, so the solution is

x=4.\boxed{x=4}.

Why factoring works here

Both terms contain a power of 22 with the same base. That makes factoring the shared 2x2^x the fastest method. Once the exponential part is isolated, the equation turns into a basic power comparison.

This is a standard pattern in exponential equations: rewrite each term with the same base, factor the common exponential expression, solve the resulting simpler equation, and then verify the result.


Pitfalls the pros know 👇 A common mistake is trying to divide both sides by 2x2^x too early without first noticing that 2x2^x is a common factor on the left. While that can work here, it is easy to lose track of the structure and make algebra errors. Another issue is forgetting the check step. Exponential equations can sometimes produce extraneous-looking results if you manipulate them poorly, so substituting back into the original equation is good practice. Also, be careful not to treat 2x+22^{x+2} as 2x+222^x+2^2; exponents do not distribute over addition.

What if the problem changes? If the equation were 2x+32x+1=482^{x+3}-2^{x+1}=48, the same method would apply: factor out the smallest power of 2, giving 2x+1(41)=482^{x+1}(4-1)=48, so 2x+1=162^{x+1}=16 and x=3x=3. If the right-hand side were not a power of 2, for example 2x+22x=502^{x+2}-2^x=50, the same factoring step would lead to 32x=503\cdot 2^x=50, so x=log2(50/3)x=\log_2(50/3) instead of an integer.

Tags: common factor in exponents, power of the same base, exponential equation check

FAQ

How do you solve an exponential equation by factoring powers of the same base?

Rewrite each term using the same base, factor out the common exponential term, solve the simpler equation, and then check the result in the original equation.

Why should you check the answer after solving an exponential equation?

Checking confirms that algebraic manipulation did not introduce an error and that the value actually satisfies the original exponential equation.

chat