Question
Coin ratio after theft with Rs 2 and Rs 5 denominations
Original question: In a school locker, a box contains only Rs 2 and Rs 5 coins. The total number of coins is 120. A student steals one-third of the Rs 2 coins and one-quarter of the Rs 5 coins. After this theft, the ratio of the remaining number of Rs 2 coins to Rs 5 coins becomes 8 : 15. If the stolen money is then entirely converted into a single denomination of Rs 10 notes, the total value of the money remaining in the box is exactly Rs 40 more than 2 times the total value of those new Rs 10 notes. What was the total monetary value originally in the box?
Expert Verified Solution
Key concept: Ratios of Rs 2 coins and Rs 5 coins become a solvable system once the remaining counts are compared after the theft.[1]
Step by step
Set up the coin counts
Let the original number of Rs 2 coins be and the number of Rs 5 coins be . The problem says the total number of coins is 120, so we have
After the theft, one-third of the Rs 2 coins and one-quarter of the Rs 5 coins are removed. That leaves
Rs 2 coins and Rs 5 coins.
The new ratio is given as , so
Solve the ratio equation
The expression simplifies to . Setting that equal to gives
Cancel the common factor 8:
Cross-multiplying gives
so
.
Now use . Since ,
.
Find the original total value
The original value in the box is
.
So the original monetary value was Rs 465.
Important consistency note
The extra statement about the stolen money being converted into Rs 10 notes does not match integer coin counts, because one-quarter of 75 is 18.75 coins, which is not possible for actual coins. The ratio information and total coin count still determine the original value as Rs 465, but the theft sentence is internally inconsistent as written.
Pitfall alert
The trap in this Rs 2 and Rs 5 coin problem is trying to use the stolen-money sentence first and getting stuck on fractional coins. The ratio after theft is the reliable equation, and it already determines the original counts. If you let the remaining Rs 2 coins be and the remaining Rs 5 coins be , the ratio condition leads cleanly to . Another common mistake is reading the 8:15 ratio backward as , which would flip the system and produce the wrong coin counts. Also note that the given theft details are not fully consistent with whole coins, so do not force them to produce an exact Rs 10-note conversion if the arithmetic does not fit. The total original value comes from the valid system: 45 coins of Rs 2 and 75 coins of Rs 5, giving Rs 465.
Try different conditions
If the theft changed so that one-half of the Rs 2 coins and one-third of the Rs 5 coins were stolen, while the remaining ratio became 3:4, the same modeling method would apply with a new pair of equations. You would write and . That kind of variation tests whether you can translate words into algebraic fractions without changing the structure of the system. If instead the coin types were Rs 1 and Rs 5, the ratio equation would still be linear, but the final value equation would change to . In each variation, the key skill is converting the remaining fractions into a ratio equation before touching any value statement.
Further reading
ratio of remaining coins, system of linear equations, coin denomination value
FAQ
How do you find the original number of Rs 2 and Rs 5 coins from the remaining ratio?
Let the original counts be x and y. Use the total coin count x plus y equals 120, then convert the remaining fractions after theft into a ratio equation. Solving those two equations gives the original counts.
Why should you be careful with the theft information in this coin ratio problem?
Because the stated fractions can lead to non-integer coin counts, which is impossible in real life. The ratio and total count still determine the original value, but the theft sentence may be inconsistent as written.