Question
Counting integer solutions in a nested radical equation
Original question: 22. How many pairs of integers satisfy the equation ? A 0 B 1 C 4 D 8 E infinitely many
Expert Verified Solution
Expert intro: Nested radical equations like require matching both rational and irrational parts carefully.
Detailed walkthrough
Step 1: Square the structure, not just the symbols
The equation is with . Because the left-hand side is a square root, it is always nonnegative, so the right-hand side must also be nonnegative. More importantly, the left side has the form “integer minus a square root of an integer,” while the right side is “integer minus .” That tells us the irrational part must match exactly.
Square both sides: Now compare rational and irrational parts. The left side has rational part and irrational part . The right side has rational part and irrational part .
Step 2: Match the rational and irrational parts
For these two expressions to be equal, we need and The second equation implies Substitute into this: so which gives Thus .
Now check which sign works in the original equation. If , then the right side is , whose square has a positive irrational part. But the left side becomes when , which is too small to equal . So does not work.
If , then , and the equation becomes Since , the left side is and indeed So , is a valid solution.
Step 3: Count the pairs
There is exactly one integer pair that works.
The correct choice is B. 1.
Common pitfall
A frequent mistake is to square immediately and then treat as if it could be any real number independent of . It cannot: because is an integer, the radical part has to fit an integer-based structure. Another common error is forgetting that the right side must be nonnegative before squaring. If , then no solution is possible because a square root cannot equal a negative number.
The cleanest path is to square once, match the rational and irrational parts, and then verify the surviving candidate directly in the original equation.
💡 Pitfall guide
The difficult step is not the algebra of squaring; it is recognizing that and live in different number types unless their irrational parts line up perfectly. If you jump straight to expanding both sides without comparing the rational and irrational components, you may keep impossible candidates. Another trap is accepting both and after solving . The original equation is asymmetric because the right side is , so the sign matters. You must check any candidate back in the unsquared equation, not just in the squared one.
🔄 Real-world variant
If the equation were changed to , the same method would still apply, but the matching equations would change. After squaring, the right side becomes , so you would compare it with . That leads to and , hence . Substituting gives , so and again . Verifying in the original equation would then determine which sign works. This variant shows how the coefficient of changes the entire solution count even though the method stays the same.
🔍 Related terms
nested radical equation, rational and irrational parts, integer solution count
FAQ
How do you solve a nested radical equation with integer variables?
Square the equation carefully, then compare the rational part and the irrational part separately. After that, test each candidate in the original equation to remove extraneous solutions.
Why must you verify solutions after squaring a radical equation?
Squaring can create extra solutions because it removes sign information. A candidate that works after squaring may fail in the original equation, so direct verification is necessary.