Question
Proving two root inequalities using AM GM and averages
Original question: Question 16 (15 marks) Use the Question 16 Writing Booklet.
(a) Recall that for positive real numbers and , . (Do NOT prove this.)
(i) Prove that for all positive real numbers and . 1
(ii) Prove that for all positive real numbers and . 2
Expert Verified Solution
Expert intro: The inequalities and both come from applying AM-GM to squared variables. The given estimate for positive real numbers is the bridge that turns a geometric mean into a power mean comparison [1].
Detailed walkthrough
Part (i): from to a root of squares
For positive real numbers and , we are given that To prove apply the same AM-GM idea to the positive numbers and : Since , we have . Taking square roots of both sides gives That is the required result.
The key observation is that the inequality compares a geometric mean with a quadratic average. Squaring the variables first makes the given AM-GM inequality fit the target exactly.
Part (ii): extending to four variables
For positive real numbers , we want to show Apply AM-GM to the four positive numbers : Because all variables are positive, Now take square roots of both sides: This is exactly the desired inequality.
The structure is the same as in part (i): first compare geometric and arithmetic means of squared quantities, then take the appropriate root to match the original expression.
Why this method works
The expression on the right is an RMS-type quantity, because is the root mean square of and . The root mean square is always at least the geometric mean. Likewise, for four values, is at least the fourth root of the product.
That is why both inequalities are true: they are instances of the general fact that the arithmetic mean of squares dominates the square of the arithmetic mean, and hence dominates the corresponding geometric mean after taking square roots.
Common mistake to avoid
A common error is to try to compare directly with without checking the exponents. The target has a square root on the right, so the proof must keep track of which side is being rooted and when. Another mistake is to use AM-GM on and again in part (i) and assume the result immediately matches the claim. It does not: you need AM-GM on and . In part (ii), the same care is needed with the fourth root. Every exponent must line up before taking roots [2].
💡 Pitfall guide
The step that usually causes trouble in is forgetting that the given AM-GM statement applies to positive inputs, so you should feed it and , not and directly. If you apply AM-GM to and , you get , which is true but not the target. Another subtle issue is taking square roots before the inequality has been written in the correct form. You must first obtain , then take square roots, because both sides are positive. In the four-variable part, students often misread as something like , which changes the exponent count and breaks the argument. Keep the exponents aligned all the way through.
🔄 Real-world variant
If the first inequality were changed to prove for positive real numbers and , then the given AM-GM statement already solves it directly. If the second inequality were changed to , you would apply AM-GM once to the four numbers and obtain the result immediately. A slightly different variant, such as proving , would need a new idea because the exponent pattern no longer matches a simple square-root form. The original question works smoothly because squaring the variables converts the target into a direct AM-GM application.
🔍 Related terms
arithmetic mean geometric mean, root mean square, power mean inequality
FAQ
How can AM-GM prove an inequality involving square roots of products and sums of squares?
Apply AM-GM to the squared variables. That turns the geometric mean of the squares into a bound by the average of the squares, and then taking square roots gives the desired inequality.
Why does the fourth-root inequality follow from the same idea?
The product under the fourth root can be rewritten using squared variables. AM-GM applied to those squared values gives a bound by the average of the squares, and taking square roots finishes the proof.