Question
Solving an exponential equation with mixed bases and fractional exponents
Original question:
Expert Verified Solution
Key concept: Exponential equation becomes manageable after rewriting both sides with compatible bases and isolating the exponent relation.
Step by step
Rewrite the bases in a useful form
The equation is
A productive move is to rewrite and using prime bases:
Then the equation becomes
or
Now both sides contain factors of 2 and 3, so we can compare exponents after finding a value that makes the fractional exponent behave nicely.
Test the exponent structure
The exponent suggests looking for a simple value of that makes the expression neat. Try :
That works immediately.
So one solution is
To check whether there could be others, note that the function
is defined for . In the positive region, it grows steadily, and the matching value is the natural exact solution produced by the factorization of 6. For school-level problems of this form, an exact substitution is usually the intended route.
Why is the clean answer
The equation is designed so that pairs with . That makes the left-hand side equal to without any approximation. If you try to solve it using logarithms, you get
which is valid but more complicated than necessary. The hidden pattern is the real key.
A good habit with mixed-base exponential equations is to inspect whether one exponent can become a simple fraction like , , or . Here, leads directly to , and the base-3 factor then fits perfectly.
Pitfall alert
The first place this equation can go wrong is inside the exponent , where students sometimes multiply incorrectly and turn it into or . That changes the entire equation. Another common mistake is to rewrite as instead of ; the exponent 3 must stay attached to the cube root relation . A third issue is jumping straight to logarithms and then losing track of the denominator . While logs do work, they are not the quickest path here. In this specific problem, noticing that makes the exponent equal to is the cleanest route. Always test simple values suggested by the target number on the right side, especially when the constants 6, 8, and 3 invite a base-match like and .
Try different conditions
If the equation were changed to , the same approach would show that is a natural candidate, because and the left side would need a different balance. That altered version would likely require logarithms rather than a simple integer guess. If the exponent changed to , giving , then would no longer make the second factor equal to 2, so the exact solution would shift. The important part is that changing either the right-hand side or the denominator changes the exponent balance, and the solution method must be adjusted accordingly. For this original equation, the intended solution is the neat matching value .
Further reading
exponential equation solving, fractional exponent, base matching method
FAQ
How do you solve the equation three to the x times eight to the x over x plus two equals six?
Rewrite eight as two cubed and test simple values that make the fractional exponent easy. The value x equals one makes the left side become three times two, which equals six.
Why is x equal to one the natural solution for this exponential equation?
Because the exponent x over x plus two becomes one third when x is one, and eight to the one third is two. That gives a perfect match with three to the first power.