Question
Finding the domain of a nested inverse trigonometric composition
Original question: 50. The domain of the function is (1) (2) (3) (4) [JEE (Main)-2022]
Expert Verified Solution
Expert intro: This problem is a domain-checking exercise where each inverse trig layer imposes its own admissible interval.
Detailed walkthrough
Step 1: Start from the outer function
The function is
For the outer to be defined, its input must satisfy
So we need
Multiplying by gives
But always lies in when it is defined, so the real restriction comes from the inner argument of .
Step 2: Apply the domain condition for arcsine
For to exist, we need
Here,
So we require
which is equivalent to
Now solve this inequality:
Case 1:
Case 2:
We must also exclude points where , i.e. , since the denominator would vanish.
Combining everything, the domain is
Why this works
This type of problem is solved by moving from the outside inward. First check the admissible output of the outer inverse cosine, then enforce the input condition for arcsine, and finally exclude denominator zeros. The final set is the intersection of all these constraints.
A useful habit is to simplify absolute-value inequalities before splitting into cases. That keeps the domain work clean and reduces algebraic mistakes.
💡 Pitfall guide
Students often forget that the denominator cannot be zero even if the inequality seems to allow nearby values. Another common mistake is stopping after writing without converting it into an absolute-value condition. That can lead to missed intervals or incorrect extra points. Also, the outer does not create a new restriction here beyond requiring its argument to stay in , so the real challenge is the nested arcsine and the denominator exclusion.
🔄 Real-world variant
If the inner expression were , the domain would change because the inequality would become , or . That would produce a different threshold for and could eliminate the isolated point . If the outer function were instead of , the outer-step check would still require the same input interval , so the main work would remain unchanged.
🔍 Related terms
inverse sine domain, nested function composition, absolute value inequality
FAQ
How do you find the domain of a nested inverse trigonometric function?
Work from the inside outward. First make sure each inverse trig input lies in its allowed interval, then exclude any denominator zeros and combine all conditions.
Why does the inner denominator matter even when the inverse trig range looks valid?
A denominator equal to zero makes the expression undefined before any inverse trig restriction is applied. Domain checking must include algebraic restrictions as well as inverse trig bounds.