Question
Implicit differentiation of an equation with x plus y cubed
Original question: Find for , in terms of and using implicit differentiation. [5 marks]
5/5
Expert Verified Solution
Key concept: The equation 2x + (x+y)^3 = y becomes tractable once the chain rule is applied to the composite term (x+y)^3 [1].
Step by step
Differentiate each term with respect to x
For the equation , every term must be differentiated with respect to , and is treated as a function of . That means , while .
The composite term requires the chain rule. Let the inside be . Then
So differentiating the whole equation gives
Isolate the derivative
Expand the bracket to separate the terms:
Now move all derivative terms to one side:
Factor out on the right:
Finally divide by :
Final result
This is already in terms of and , which is exactly what implicit differentiation should produce.
Why the chain rule matters here
The term is not just a polynomial in ; it is a composite function whose inside also depends on through . That is why the derivative of the inside is , not just 1. Missing the part is one of the most common reasons students lose marks on implicit differentiation problems.
The algebra after differentiation is just as important as the calculus. Once the derivative appears on both sides, the goal is to collect all terms together and factor them cleanly. That step turns a long expression into a simple fraction.
Common mistake to avoid
Do not differentiate as and stop there. That ignores the derivative of the inside function , which contributes the extra factor . Another frequent error is distributing incorrectly when expanding ; both the constant part and the derivative part must be kept. A final trap is misplacing the derivative after factoring. When you move to the other side, the sign changes, so the denominator must become , not .
If you keep the chain rule, product structure, and rearrangement in separate stages, the result is straightforward to verify.
Pitfall alert
The hardest step in this implicit differentiation problem is the composite term , because it is easy to differentiate only the outer power and forget that the inside also changes with . That missing factor is not just 1; it is . If you write without the chain-rule multiplier, the final slope formula will be wrong even if the algebra afterward is perfect. Another place where students get stuck is the rearrangement stage. Once appears on both sides, you must gather every derivative term on one side before factoring. If you try to divide too early, the expression becomes harder to track and sign errors are likely. Also, because the answer is requested in terms of and , do not try to solve for y explicitly unless the problem asks for it; implicit differentiation is meant to leave the relation intact.
Try different conditions
If the equation were changed to , the setup would be similar but the chain rule would produce a fourth-power derivative: . Rearranging would give , so the derivative would become . Another useful variation is . In that case the inside derivative changes to instead of , because the derivative of is . That sign change often alters the denominator after rearrangement, which is why the chain rule step must match the exact inside expression.
Further reading
implicit differentiation chain rule, solving for dy dx, composite function derivative
FAQ
How do I apply the chain rule when differentiating a term like x plus y cubed implicitly?
Differentiate the outer power first, then multiply by the derivative of the inside expression. Because y depends on x, the derivative of x plus y is one plus dy dx.
Why do I need to collect all dy dx terms on one side after differentiating?
Collecting the derivative terms lets you factor out dy dx and solve for it directly. Without that step, the derivative appears on both sides and the expression stays difficult to isolate.