Sectional Conflict: Regional Differences

AP US History· difficulty 3/5

"The American continents, by the free and independent condition which they have assumed and maintain, are henceforth not to be considered as subjects for future colonization by any European powers... We owe it therefore to candor to declare that we should consider any attempt on their part to extend their system to any portion of this hemisphere as dangerous to our peace and safety." — President James Monroe, Annual Message, 1823

36°30' line (1820) United States, c.1823

The map's dashed line at 36°30' best supports which claim about the Era of Good Feelings?

  • A

    Native nations had been removed east of the Mississippi

  • B

    The federal government had abandoned territorial expansion

  • C

    Tariff disputes had eclipsed slavery as the chief sectional issue

  • D

    Sectional disputes over slavery's expansion persisted beneath surface unity

    check_circle

Explanation

The 1820 Missouri Compromise line shows that even amid Monroe's nationalism, slavery's expansion remained a fault line. Removal, tariffs, and an end to expansion don't fit the 1823 context.

Want 10 more like this — adaptive to your weak spots?

Related questions