Command of Evidence: Quantitative

SAT Reading and Writing· difficulty 5/5

A 2022 study compared four wetland sites' frog populations along with two factors: presence of road runoff (yes/no) and water acidity (high/low pH): Site A, no runoff + low acidity, 540 frogs; B, no runoff + high acidity, 320; C, runoff + low acidity, 220; D, runoff + high acidity, 90. The researchers argued road runoff and water acidity <em>both</em> harm frogs and that runoff's effect is similar in magnitude across acidity levels. The strongest support is ______

Which choice most logically completes the text using the data above?

  • A

    Site A's highest count of 540.

  • B

    the average count across sites.

  • C

    the within-acidity contrasts: A vs. C (low acidity: 540-220=320 frogs lost to runoff) and B vs. D (high acidity: 320-90=230 frogs lost to runoff)—runoff penalty is large at both acidity levels.

    check_circle
  • D

    Site D's count of 90.

Explanation

To argue runoff's effect is similar across acidity levels, compare runoff's effect within each acidity stratum. Choice B captures both within-acidity comparisons (320 and 230 frogs lost) and shows runoff matters at both acidity levels.

Want 10 more like this — adaptive to your weak spots?

Related questions