Command of Evidence: Quantitative

SAT Reading and Writing· difficulty 5/5

Biologists studied four wetland sites and recorded amphibian populations along with two factors: pesticide concentration in water (high/low) and habitat fragmentation (high/low). Site A, low pesticide + low fragmentation, 320 amphibians; B, low pesticide + high fragmentation, 230; C, high pesticide + low fragmentation, 90; D, high pesticide + high fragmentation, 60. The researchers concluded that high pesticide exposure has a stronger negative effect than habitat fragmentation, and that both effects are additive rather than interactive. The data most uniquely supporting "additive rather than interactive" effects is ______

Which choice most logically completes the text using the data above?

  • A

    the consistency of the fragmentation penalty: about 90 fewer amphibians under fragmentation in low-pesticide sites (320→230) and about 30 fewer in high-pesticide sites (90→60), with the pesticide penalty similarly consistent across fragmentation levels.

    check_circle
  • B

    Site A's highest amphibian count of 320.

  • C

    Site D's lowest amphibian count of 60.

  • D

    the average count across sites.

Explanation

"Additive rather than interactive" effects require that each factor's effect is roughly the same regardless of the other factor's level. Choice B examines this directly. Note: "additive in absolute terms" or "in proportional terms" can be debated, but among the four answer choices, B is the only response that addresses additivity by examining whether each variable's effect persists similarly across levels of the other—the others speak only to single sites or averages.

Want 10 more like this — adaptive to your weak spots?

Related questions