Command of Evidence: Quantitative

SAT Reading and Writing· difficulty 5/5

Researchers studied four reforestation projects and reported tree survival (% after 3 years) along with two factors: planting density (high/low) and presence of irrigation (yes/no). Project A, high density + irrigation, 78%; B, high density + no irrigation, 35%; C, low density + irrigation, 82%; D, low density + no irrigation, 65%. The researchers concluded that irrigation had a much larger effect on survival than planting density did. The strongest data support is ______

Which choice most logically completes the text using the data above?

  • A

    the average survival across projects.

  • B

    Project C's highest survival of 82%.

  • C

    Project B's lowest survival of 35%.

  • D

    irrigation's within-density effects (A vs. B: +43 points; C vs. D: +17 points) versus density's within-irrigation effects (A vs. C: -4 points; B vs. D: -30 points)—irrigation adds 43 in one comparison while density's effect runs from -4 to -30.

    check_circle

Explanation

To argue irrigation has a much larger effect than density, examine each variable's effect while holding the other constant. Choice B does this for both variables and shows irrigation's effects (+43, +17) include a larger maximum than density's (-4, -30 are smaller in magnitude). This is the only choice that quantitatively addresses the comparison.

Want 10 more like this — adaptive to your weak spots?

Related questions