Command of Evidence: Quantitative

SAT Reading and Writing· difficulty 4/5

A study compared math achievement at four schools differing in two ways: tracking policy (yes/no) and average teacher experience (low/high). Scores: School J, tracked + low experience, 65; K, tracked + high experience, 78; L, untracked + low experience, 64; M, untracked + high experience, 79. The researchers concluded that tracking has essentially no effect on math achievement once teacher experience is controlled. The strongest data support is ______

Which choice most logically completes the text using the data above?

  • A

    the gap between J and M.

  • B

    the close match within experience strata: J vs. L (65 vs. 64) and K vs. M (78 vs. 79)—tracking changes scores by only 1 point.

    check_circle
  • C

    School M's score of 79.

  • D

    School J's score of 65.

Explanation

"Tracking has essentially no effect once experience is controlled" requires showing that holding experience constant and varying tracking produces tiny score differences. Choice B does this in both experience strata.

Want 10 more like this — adaptive to your weak spots?

Related questions