Question

Estimating capacitor energy from a small charge increase

Original question: A capacitor is connected to a power supply and charged to a potential difference V0V_0. The graph shows how the potential difference VV across the capacitor varies with the charge QQ on the capacitor.

At a potential difference V0V_0 a small charge ΔQ\Delta Q is added to the capacitor. This results in a small increase in potential difference ΔV\Delta V across the capacitor.

Which of the following gives the approximate increase in energy stored on the capacitor

due to this extra charge?

A ΔV×ΔQ\Delta V \times \Delta Q

B ΔV×ΔQ2\frac{\Delta V \times \Delta Q}{2}

C V0×ΔQV_0 \times \Delta Q

Expert Verified Solution

thumb_up100%(1 rated)

Key takeaway: This question tests the area-under-a-graph idea for capacitor energy stored from a VV-QQ curve.

Key relationship

The energy stored in a capacitor is the work needed to move charge onto it. On a VV-QQ graph, that work is the area under the curve:

U=VdQ.U=\int V\,dQ.

For a small added charge ΔQ\Delta Q at a voltage near V0V_0, the voltage is not constant. It increases from V0V_0 to V0+ΔVV_0+\Delta V while the extra charge is added.

Approximate energy for a small increment

If the graph is approximately linear over the small interval, the added energy is the area of a narrow trapezium:

ΔU(V0+(V0+ΔV))2ΔQ.\Delta U \approx \frac{(V_0+(V_0+\Delta V))}{2}\,\Delta Q.

That is

ΔU(V0+ΔV2)ΔQ.\Delta U \approx \left(V_0+\frac{\Delta V}{2}\right)\Delta Q.

The exact expression is slightly more detailed than the answer choices, but for the small incremental energy due to the extra charge, the piece that correctly matches the graph interpretation is the average voltage times ΔQ\Delta Q.

Match to the options

  • A: ΔV×ΔQ\Delta V\times\Delta Q uses only the rise in voltage and ignores the starting voltage.
  • B: ΔV×ΔQ2\frac{\Delta V\times\Delta Q}{2} is the area of the small triangular wedge above the initial horizontal level, not the total added energy.
  • C: V0×ΔQV_0\times\Delta Q treats the voltage as constant and misses the increase during charging.

For a capacitor being charged slightly from a point already at V0V_0, the best approximation in the given context is the trapezium-area idea. Among the listed choices, the incremental energy associated with the small added charge is represented by the average-voltage picture, not by V0ΔQV_0\Delta Q alone.

Final choice

The appropriate approximation is the area under the small segment of the VV-QQ graph, which corresponds to the trapezium estimate. If the question expects the standard textbook first-order result for the extra energy in the small added charge interval, the closest option is B when interpreting the increment above the initial line, but the physically correct area statement is ΔU(V0+ΔV2)ΔQ\Delta U\approx \left(V_0+\frac{\Delta V}{2}\right)\Delta Q.

Important interpretation note

If the exam context is asking for the additional work done only by the small rise in potential difference, then option B reflects the triangular increase piece. If it is asking for the total added energy for the charge increment, then none of the options is fully complete because the starting level V0V_0 must also be included.


Pitfalls the pros know 👇 A serious mistake is to memorize U=QVU=QV and then apply it directly to a charging process without thinking about changing voltage. For a capacitor, the voltage rises as charge is added, so the energy comes from the area under the VV-QQ curve, not just one endpoint value. Another error is to use V0ΔQV_0\Delta Q when the graph clearly indicates a further increase in voltage over the added charge interval. Always check whether the question wants total stored energy, incremental energy, or only the extra area above an initial reference line.

What if the problem changes? If the capacitor were charged from zero to QQ on a straight-line VV-QQ graph, the total energy would be the triangular area 12QV\frac12QV. If the same capacitor were already partly charged and then given a small extra ΔQ\Delta Q, the incremental energy would be a trapezium area rather than a rectangle. Those two cases use the same principle, but the geometry of the graph changes the factor of 12\tfrac12 and the role of V0V_0.

Tags: capacitor energy, V-Q graph, stored electric energy

FAQ

How do you estimate the energy added to a capacitor from a V-Q graph?

The added energy is the area under the V-Q curve over the charge interval. For a small increment, this area is well approximated by a trapezium, so you use average voltage times Delta Q.

Why is the energy not just V0 times Delta Q for a charging capacitor?

Because the capacitor voltage increases while the extra charge is added. The work is therefore based on the changing voltage, not only the starting value V0.

chat