Question
How to use the limit comparison test to prove series convergence
Original question: 48. (a) Suppose that and are series with positive terms and is convergent. Prove that if
then is also convergent.
(b) Use part (a) to show that the series converges.
(i)
(ii)
Expert Verified Solution
Expert intro: A clean way to handle positive-term series is to compare them with something you already know converges. Here the key move is to squeeze the smaller series underneath a convergent one.
Detailed walkthrough
(a) Why converges
Assume , , and converges. We are given
That limit means that for large , the ratio is tiny. In particular, there exists some such that for every ,
so
Because the terms are positive, we can compare tails:
The right-hand side converges, so the left-hand side also converges by the comparison test. Adding the finite initial part does not change convergence, hence converges.
(b)(i)
Take
Since converges, it is enough to show
That limit is standard, so by part (a),
converges.
(b)(ii)
Use the fact that for small ,
A simple comparison is even enough: for all real ,
With ,
Now compare with the convergent -series . So
converges.
If you want to phrase part (b) strictly using part (a), you can also note that
so the series behaves like .
💡 Pitfall guide
A common slip is forgetting that part (a) needs positive terms. That matters because the comparison argument is based on inequalities between tails. Another easy mistake is choosing a comparison series that is not known to converge. For example, in (i) comparing with would be too weak; is the right size. In (ii), many students remember , but the correct small-angle behavior is quadratic, not linear.
🔄 Real-world variant
If the numerator in (i) were a slower-growing function, like , the same idea would still work as long as you compare against a convergent -series and the ratio goes to . For (ii), if the angle were , then would behave like , so the series would still converge. If the angle were much larger, say , then the same expansion would give a term comparable to , which would change the outcome.
🔍 Related terms
comparison test, limit comparison test, p-series
FAQ
How do you prove that a positive-term series converges when a_n/b_n -> 0 and sum b_n converges?
Since a_n/b_n -> 0, for all large n we have a_n < b_n. The tail of sum a_n is then bounded above by the tail of the convergent series sum b_n, so sum a_n converges by the comparison test.
Why do the series sum (ln n)/n^3 and sum(1-cos(1/n^2)) converge?
For sum (ln n)/n^3, compare with sum 1/n^2 because (ln n/n^3)/(1/n^2)=ln n/n -> 0. For sum(1-cos(1/n^2)), use 1-cos x <= x^2/2, giving 1-cos(1/n^2) <= 1/(2n^4), so the series converges by comparison with the p-series sum 1/n^4.