Question
Rewriting a hyperbolic function and evaluating its integral
Original question: 4. f(x) = 5 cosh x - 4 sinh x, x \in \mathbb{R}.
(a) Show that f(x) = \frac{1}{2}(e^x + 9e^{-x}).
Hence
(b) solve f(x) = 5,
(c) show that \int_{\frac{1}{2}\ln 3}^{\ln 3} \frac{1}{5 \cosh x - 4 \sinh x}, dx = \frac{\pi}{18}.
Expert Verified Solution
Expert intro: This problem connects hyperbolic identities, algebraic solving, and an integral that becomes simple after rewriting the denominator.
Detailed walkthrough
Part (a): rewrite using exponential definitions
Given
use the identities
Substitute these into :
Collect terms:
That proves the required identity.
Part (b): solve
Using the exponential form,
Multiply by 2 and then by :
Let , where . Then
which factors as
Hence
So
Part (c): evaluate the integral
We want
From part (a), the denominator is
So the integrand becomes
Multiply top and bottom by :
Now use the substitution
The limits change to
Thus
This is a standard arctangent integral:
Evaluate:
=\frac{2}{3}\left(\arctan(1)-\arctan\left(\frac{\sqrt3}{3}\right)\right).$$ Since $\arctan(1)=\frac{\pi}{4}$ and $\arctan(\sqrt3/3)=\frac{\pi}{6}$, we get $$\frac{2}{3}\left(\frac{\pi}{4}-\frac{\pi}{6}\right)=\frac{2}{3}\cdot\frac{\pi}{12}=\frac{\pi}{18}.$$ ## Key idea to remember Hyperbolic functions often become much easier after converting them to exponentials. In this question, that step turns the equation into a quadratic in $e^x$ and turns the integral into a basic arctangent form. ### 💡 Pitfall guide A typical mistake is to try to integrate $1/(5\cosh x-4\sinh x)$ directly without rewriting it. That leads to unnecessary algebra and often to a wrong antiderivative. Another common error is forgetting that when you set $u=e^x$, the differential is $du=e^x dx$, not just $dx$. Finally, in part (b), some students stop at $e^{2x}-10e^x+9=0$ but forget that $e^x$ must be positive, which is why the substitution $u=e^x$ is so useful and safe. ### 🔄 Real-world variant If the integrand were $\frac{1}{3\cosh x+4\sinh x}$ instead, the same exponential rewrite would produce $\frac{2}{7e^x- e^{-x}}$, leading to a different substitution outcome and potentially a logarithmic form instead of an arctangent. If the equation in part (b) were $5\cosh x-4\sinh x=9$, the same method would give a quadratic in $e^x$ with different roots. The structure of the solution stays the same: rewrite, substitute $u=e^x$, and solve the resulting algebraic equation. ### 🔍 Related terms hyperbolic cosine, exponential substitution, arctangent integralFAQ
Why do hyperbolic functions become easier after rewriting them as exponentials?
The exponential definitions of cosh and sinh turn combinations of hyperbolic functions into algebraic expressions in e^x and e^{-x}. That often simplifies equations into quadratics and integrals into standard forms.
What substitution is used to evaluate the definite integral in this problem?
Let u = e^x, so du = e^x dx. This changes the hyperbolic integrand into a rational function, which can then be integrated using the arctangent formula.