Taxation Without Representation

AP US History· difficulty 3/5

"It is inseparably essential to the freedom of a people, and the undoubted right of Englishmen, that no taxes be imposed on them, but with their own consent, given personally, or by their representatives." — Stamp Act Congress, Declaration of Rights and Grievances, 1765

Parliamentary Revenue Acts on the Colonies, 1764-1773 Year Act Targets 1764 Sugar Act Molasses, sugar 1765 Stamp Act Printed materials 1767 Townshend Glass, paper, tea 1773 Tea Act Tea monopoly

The table and excerpt together best support which colonial argument?

  • A

    Colonial assemblies had no right to tax their own citizens

  • B

    Only the king, not Parliament, could levy any tax on colonists

  • C

    Colonists welcomed parliamentary taxation as a way to share imperial burdens

  • D

    Parliament could not constitutionally tax colonies that lacked representation in it

    check_circle

Explanation

The pattern of revenue acts triggered the Stamp Act Congress's principle that taxation required consent through representation—the basis of "no taxation without representation."

Want 10 more like this — adaptive to your weak spots?

Related questions