Inferences

SAT Reading and Writing· difficulty 4/5

Researchers studying organizational hiring found that resume reviewers asked to spend more time on each application made decisions that more closely matched candidates' actual job performance, but the time-restricted reviewers expressed greater confidence in their judgments. Both groups, when surveyed afterwards, believed they had made well-considered decisions; only the careful reviewers' decisions actually predicted performance outcomes.

Which inference is most strongly supported by the passage?

  • A

    The subjective experience of having decided well can occur even when decision quality is lower

    check_circle
  • B

    Resume review is unrelated to actual job performance under any conditions

  • C

    Time-restricted reviewers consistently outperformed careful ones

  • D

    Self-reported confidence in a decision reliably tracks the decision's accuracy

Explanation

Both groups felt they decided well, but only one group's decisions tracked outcomes — supporting B. A contradicts the finding; C reverses it; D ignores the careful-reviewer correlation.

Want 10 more like this — adaptive to your weak spots?

Related questions