Command of Evidence: Quantitative

SAT Reading and Writing· difficulty 2/5

Researchers compared corn yield (bushels per acre) on four farms using different irrigation methods: Farm 1 (flood), 110; Farm 2 (sprinkler), 135; Farm 3 (drip), 178; Farm 4 (subsurface drip), 192. The researchers argued that newer drip-based methods substantially outperform older flood irrigation. To support this, they pointed to ______

Which choice most logically completes the text using the data above?

  • A

    Farm 2's sprinkler yield of 135.

  • B

    Farm 1's flood-irrigation yield of 110.

  • C

    the gap between flood (110) and subsurface drip (192), nearly 75% more yield.

    check_circle
  • D

    the modest difference between drip and subsurface drip.

Explanation

The claim is that drip methods substantially outperform flood. Choice B directly quantifies this gap (110 vs. 192), supporting "substantially outperform."

Want 10 more like this — adaptive to your weak spots?

Related questions