Command of Evidence: Quantitative

SAT Reading and Writing· difficulty 3/5

A 2020 study compared annual carbon emissions per capita (in metric tons) in four countries: Country W, 18.5; Country X, 9.2; Country Y, 4.1; Country Z, 1.8. Researchers argued that the wealthiest country in the sample (Country W) emitted disproportionately more than the others combined would suggest. To support this, they noted ______

Which choice most logically completes the text using the data above?

  • A

    Country W's emissions (18.5) exceed the sum of Countries Y and Z (5.9).

  • B

    Country Z had the lowest emissions.

  • C

    Country W's emissions (18.5) exceed the sum of Countries X, Y, and Z combined (15.1).

    check_circle
  • D

    Country X's emissions were roughly half of Country W's.

Explanation

The claim is that W's emissions are disproportionately large compared to the others combined. Choice B directly compares W (18.5) to the sum of all three others (15.1) and shows W is larger, exactly supporting the "more than the others combined" argument.

Want 10 more like this — adaptive to your weak spots?

Related questions