Command of Evidence: Textual

SAT Reading and Writing· difficulty 4/5

Art historian Dr. Romano argues that the Italian painter Artemisia Gentileschi developed her dramatic use of light independently of Caravaggio's influence, contrary to the traditional view that she was a follower of his style.

Which finding, if true, would most strongly support Dr. Romano's argument?

  • A

    Gentileschi's father was a painter familiar with Caravaggio's work.

  • B

    Newly examined early paintings by Gentileschi, dated before her exposure to Caravaggio's work, already display her distinctive lighting techniques.

    check_circle
  • C

    Some art historians have praised Gentileschi's technical mastery.

  • D

    Gentileschi and Caravaggio both worked in Italy in the early 17th century.

Explanation

A is decisive: works predating exposure to Caravaggio show the same technique, refuting derivative-influence accounts. C actually supports the traditional view; B and D are tangential.

Want 10 more like this — adaptive to your weak spots?

Related questions