Command of Evidence: Textual

SAT Reading and Writing· difficulty 5/5

Dr. Singh hypothesizes that exposure to nature reduces rumination — the tendency to dwell on negative thoughts — and that this reduction, rather than mood improvement in general, accounts for nature's mental health benefits.

Which finding, if true, would most strongly support Dr. Singh's specific hypothesis?

  • A

    People with depression often spend less time outdoors.

  • B

    Participants reported feeling happier after walking in either a park or an urban setting.

  • C

    Participants who walked in a park showed reduced rumination but no greater general mood improvement than those who walked in an urban setting.

    check_circle
  • D

    Nature exposure has been linked to lower stress hormone levels.

Explanation

A specifically isolates rumination reduction (without general mood gain) as the differential effect of nature, exactly as Singh predicts. B and D would be consistent with broader benefits but don't isolate rumination; C is correlational.

Want 10 more like this — adaptive to your weak spots?

Related questions