Text 1: Policy analyst Park argues that paid family leave produces measurable benefits for parents and children. Mothers in countries with generous paid leave have higher labor-force attachment over time; infants benefit from longer parental contact; longitudinal studies suggest small but meaningful child-development gains.
Text 2: Policy analyst Singh accepts the benefits Park describes but raises a design question. Leave structured exclusively as "maternity leave," she argues, can entrench gender inequalities in caregiving and labor markets; programs that include earmarked time for fathers — as in Sweden — distribute caregiving more equally. The case for paid leave is strong; the case for any particular design is more contested.
Both authors would most likely agree that
- A
the design of leave programs is irrelevant.
- B
paid leave has no measurable effects.
- Ccheck_circle
paid family leave can produce real benefits for parents and children.
- D
no country offers paid family leave.
Explanation
Both accept paid leave's benefits; they differ on design considerations. A is shared. B, C, and D contradict both.