Text 1: Computer scientist Park argues that artificial general intelligence is unlikely within this century. Current systems, she notes, lack any clear path from large language models to genuine reasoning, abstraction, or world-modeling. Confident timelines from Silicon Valley, Park contends, mistake hype for progress.
Text 2: Computer scientist Singh agrees that current systems fall short of general intelligence but resists Park's confidence about timelines. Predictions about technical progress, she notes, have been wrong in both directions repeatedly: experts wildly underestimated computer chess in the 1990s and overestimated language translation in the 1960s. The honest position, Singh argues, is deep uncertainty, not confident pessimism.
Based on the texts, how would Singh (Text 2) most likely respond to Park's claim?
- A
She would claim AGI has already been achieved.
- B
She would deny that current systems lack reasoning ability.
- C
She would endorse Park's confident timeline as well-supported.
- Dcheck_circle
She would share Park's view of current systems but argue against confident pessimism in either direction.
Explanation
Singh shares the diagnosis of current systems but rejects confident timeline predictions in either direction. B captures this nuance. A, C, and D misrepresent her.