Text 1: Policy analyst Ramsey argues that congestion pricing — charging drivers extra to enter crowded urban centers — is the most effective tool against gridlock. London, Stockholm, and Singapore have all seen significant drops in traffic and improvements in air quality after introducing such fees.
Text 2: Transportation planner Liu agrees that congestion pricing reduces traffic but raises equity concerns. Workers who must commute by car for shift work or to reach areas underserved by transit, she argues, often have lower incomes than those who can choose alternatives. Without offsets — discounts, transit investment — congestion pricing risks taxing those least able to pay.
Both authors would most likely agree that
- Acheck_circle
congestion pricing reduces urban traffic.
- B
congestion pricing is impossible to implement.
- C
no one drives in cities.
- D
congestion pricing has no effect on air quality.
Explanation
Both accept that congestion pricing reduces traffic; they differ on equity considerations. A is shared. B, C, and D contradict both.