Text 1: Geneticist Larsen argues that personalized medicine — treatments tailored to individual genetic profiles — will revolutionize cancer care. By sequencing a tumor's DNA, doctors can identify mutations driving its growth and select therapies precisely targeting those mutations, sparing patients the side effects of broad chemotherapy.
Text 2: Oncologist Bauer is more skeptical. Most tumors, he notes, contain dozens of mutations, only some of which are "drivers." Targeting one mutation often allows others to take over, leading to rapid resistance. Personalized therapies have produced striking but usually short-lived responses; durable cures remain rare.
How would Bauer (Text 2) most likely respond to Larsen's vision?
- A
He would deny that tumors have any genetic mutations.
- B
He would agree that personalized medicine has eliminated chemotherapy.
- C
He would argue that all cancer treatment should ignore tumor genetics.
- Dcheck_circle
He would acknowledge promise while emphasizing significant unresolved limitations.
Explanation
Bauer recognizes personalized medicine's appeal but stresses resistance and short-lived effects. B captures his qualified critique. A overstates; C and D contradict him.