Text 1: Geologist Singh argues that fracking is essential to U.S. energy independence. By extracting natural gas from shale formations, fracking has shifted the country from a net energy importer to a net exporter. Singh contends that without fracking, the United States would remain dangerously dependent on foreign oil.
Text 2: Hydrologist Park acknowledges fracking's economic benefits but raises concerns about water. Each fracking well consumes millions of gallons of freshwater, and the wastewater that returns to the surface contains brine and toxic chemicals. In drought-prone regions, Park argues, the water costs of fracking deserve serious public scrutiny.
How would Park (Text 2) most likely respond to Singh's argument in Text 1?
- A
She would say energy independence is impossible.
- B
She would deny that fracking has economic benefits.
- Ccheck_circle
She would acknowledge fracking's benefits while raising concerns Singh does not address.
- D
She would argue that fracking does not actually produce natural gas.
Explanation
Park concedes economic benefits but introduces water concerns. B captures this complementary critique. A and C contradict her; D is not her claim.